Re: Re: [glosalist]

Saluta, Holo-pe,

At 11:55 PM 2/19/04 +0100, Igor Wasilewski grafo:

Robin Gaskell pa grafo:

*** Plu Glosa partikla-de-tem [tense particles] ergo per difere mode de plu-la adi-ra [inflections] de Esperanto.

She washes the dog. Fe lavo u kani. The dog is washed by her. U kani gene ge-lavo ex fe.

She is washing the dog. Fe du lavo u kani. The dog is being washed by her. U kani du gene ge-lavo ex fe.

Gratia de tu reakti. Tu pa monstra un uti de u partikula “du”; ko-co mi pensi; exakti u-ci partikula dona solve ad u problema de ne-ge-fini morfo de no-akti-voka. *** Mi habe hedo de tu plu komenta.

  ~Du~ gene ge-adi ad u lexikon poli aanua pre nu.  Sed, veri, Glosa pa  evolve durante tem, e posi fu seqe-nu, kontinu de evolve.  Na pote dice  Glosa du evolve!

Koncerne plu bi versio de nu tem, no-akti voka, super-ci, mi extende plu frasa te dona ma signifi ad u difere ge-dona ex ‘du’.

. She washes the dog daily Fe lavo u kani singu di. . The dog is washed daily by her. Singu di, u kani gene ge-lavo ex fe. . . She is washing the dog to-day. Fe nu-di du lavo u kani. . The dog is being washed by her to-day. Nu-di, u kani du gene ge-lavo ex fe. . P.S. When I find my GID, I’ll worry about correcting the spelling. Until then, spelling is not half as important as getting the correct feel for the language. Perhaps I should download and reprint the GID: last time it took 148 pages to print it out.

Saluta,

Robin Gaskell