Re: [glosalist] Spertoj cxe planitaj lingvoj

At 09:52 AM 12/22/03 +0100, you wrote:

Por Gary

Dankon pro via respondo. Mi dezirus sciigi, ke mi emas respekti cxiun lingvon, inklude Glosa-n. Sed mi opinias, ke indas “gustumi” cxiun planlitan lingvon, antau ol oferti ian artefaritan lingvon kiel pontlingvo por Europo (kaj eventuale ankau eble por la tuta mondo). Karo Laslo, [G] Si tu grafo uti England-lingua plu Esperanto, plu-la-pe; qi ski bi Glosa e England-lingua, fu habe un abili de logi qod tu dice.

[E] If you write in English and Esperanto, those who know both kGlosa and English, will be able to understand what you are saying.

[G] Tem tu habe u fo boni idea, e id posi es u maxi boni posi-abili mode pro u ma gru ge-skema lingua pro u munda, u tali ra habe pusi posi de acide. Plu bi lingua, Esperanto e Glosa, sembla es to plu oposi lati de u grada de plu lingua.

[E] While you have a good idea, and it possibly is the best possible way for a more suitable planned language for the world, such a thing has little chance of happening. The two languages, Esperanto and Glosa, seem to be at the opposite sides of the range of languages.

[G] Mi sio spe na pote ergo alelo te mixa plu bi lingua pro face u ma boni lingua:sed id fu nece ta muta, ke u fini produce fu habe un apare de ni Glosa ni Esperanto, e sio dona hedo a nuli-pe.

[E] I would hope we can work together to mix the two languages to make a better language; but it would need so much change that the final product will have the appearance of neither Glosa nor Esperanto, and would make nobody happy.

[G] Tristi, mi habe nuli tem pro u ge-nece ergo ko Glosa, so u neo lingua inter Glosa e Esperanto fu nece habe id auto proto developo. Mi habe 67 anua, e habe nuli tem pro u-ci neo developo ergo.

[E] Sadly, I have no time for the needed work with Glosa, thus a new language between Glosa and Esperanto will need to have its own starting development. I am 67 years old, and have no time for this new development work.

Saluta,

Robin Gaskell