Re: Glosa vs IDO etc.

— In glosalist@yahoogroups.com, <Jacques@…> wrote:

Hi, Bonjour Mon= sieur Drapeau,

Pour ma part, j’ai commenc=E9 =E0 apprendre IDO et Glosa en= m=EAme temps. Au bout de quelque semaines, je me suis aper=E7u que je lis= ais couramment l’IDO, alors que plus d’un an apr=E8s, j’avais de grosses d= ifficult=E9s avec Glosa, malgr=E9 un vocabulaire extr=E8mement sympathique= . J’ai diagnostiqu=E9 que mon incapacit=E9 =E0 appr=E9hender Glosa venait = d’une insuffisance de sa grammaire qui est calqu=E9e sur l’anglais sans ce= rtains moyens propre =E0 cette langue, d’o=F9 des r=E8gles implicites qui = ne g=EAnent que les non anglophones! C’est dommage car je trouve qu’il y a= dans Glosa une excellente id=E9e avec l’invariabilit=E9 des mots.

Je vou= s souhaite de prendre autant de plaisir que j’en ai eu en apprenant des la= ngues artificielles.

LM.

Just joined. I definitely want to learn an IA= L and my preliminary screening tells me that the two best choices are pr= obably Glosa or IDO. I tend to prefer GLOSA. Would you have any article o= r site where I could find a comparison of the two, showing the advantages= of Glosa over IDO?

In fact if Glosa is the most recent of the IALs, = created after having looked at all the other ones created earlier, is th= ere not somewhere an article comparing advantageously Glosa to all the ot= her main IAL?

Thanks for your help.

Jacques Drapea= u

ex Canadian diplomat

Living in Rome, Italy.

PS: Is= there a ‘central authority’ somewhere controlling the standards and the= spreading of Glosa worldwide? The website www.glosa.org is very limited. = What is the main website(s) about Glosa?

[Non-text port= ions of this message have been removed]