Fast links: Interglossa » Glosa »
Re: [glosalist] jhnavis@yahoo.co.uk
Nick N. Mikhailenko ("Nick N. Mikhailenko" <nick0000@...>) on October 13, 2005
Good luck to pan glosa-pe ! I hope you succeed.
John Avis
- Thanks John. In a sane world there is a place for Glosa… but we aint got one.
Robin Gaskell
Dear Robin G.!
Please, write the history of Glosa-movement in simple English (unidiomatic) while you are alive Tell about men and women, as persons, in this affair. I will use your story in my site, where russian readers will have materials on Volapuk, Esperanto, Ido, Occidental, Novial, Interingua, Intal, Glosa, Slovio.
How can you don’t know Esperanto? It’s very strange!
For consideration: Mi fobo 1) mi habe fobo 2) fobo de mi
I prefer: mi -> yo, me, mi yo fobo != mi fobo
Siplicity in prescription not always = opportunaty in usage
The main interes of Glosa is in dictionary. Dead roots is more usefull than modern because of science, tekhnic, arts. Zamenhof would have a shock. Why not make Liga = Glosa + Esperanto ?
Liga simpla = Glosa Liga pedanta = Esperanto
Works of glosa-pe will be part of future universal human language. It will be so! After twenty years.
Fast links: Interglossa » Glosa »