Manuel Valderrama pa grafo:

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • =
• - Llu=EDs Batlle i Rossell pa grafo:

Ave!

Saluta, Llu=EDs.

M= i nima es Manuel, e mi es F.D. stude-pe (F.D. =3D Ph.D. in Angla lingua). =

Mi volu gene sko de Glosa. Mi gen sko de u-ci tem tetra horo. Sed mi

fo-amo u Glosa.

Tu pa gene sko de mega in tetra horo!

Mi pot= e logi u Glosa grama. Sed mi ne pote grafo u boni grama. Mi volu u-ci; v= i grafo u grama per solo Glosa.

Si tu pa pote gene logi de Glosa ta = tako, tu fu grafo poli boni grama seqe pusi tem. Mi dice a tu; Glosa es = fo facili, ma facili de Esperanto (mi ski bi-ci lingua) e si tu dura stude= id, tu fu gene boni sko de Glosa fo tako. Sed plus place kave; Glosa es j= una lingua, e singu glosa-pe dice id akorda vari pusi difere mode. U-co ne= es kako. Id acide in panto juna lingua. Glosa nece ma dice-pe te deveni h= olo matura.

Mi pote dice u esperanto-lingua. Ko-co, qe vi pote in u-c= i grego ? :)

Plus mi pote dice Esperanto, e plus Robin Gaskell e Gary Mi= ller , qe no?

Gratia! Vale :)

Mi spe; tu fu vale! Manolo. Plu Kar= o Glosa-pe [Brief English version below.] = Mi logi ke Lluis pa grafo ~Ave!~.

Pro mi-auto, un histori es 'No': mi = ne du uti Esperanto.

Mo tem mi pa lekto hemi de u komunika-flu; qi gee= ne gee-grafo uti  Esperanto; un hetero hemi de u flu, a Hiatao (Nu u Profes= ori de Lingua  intra Cina), habe mi grafo uti Glosa.

To u proto, na ut= i Glosa, sed Haitao pa qestio-mi: qe, an sio grafo uti  Esperanto, ka de pl= u Euro-mode lingua, id pa es u lingua; an ski maxi boni.

Te es brevo, = mi pote kompara direkti plu bi lingua: mi gluko grafo uti  Glosa, e pa logi=  ke Haitao pa lekto id sine traduce; alterno, mi nece  traduce, ko fo kura,=  Haitao Esperanto te gene u korekti semani.

Mo di un U.N. fu posi dice=  ad u munda: gene sko de Esperanto.  Mi, iso  Manolo, tena Glosa habe simpl= i, e eqa u lingua; qi sio gru u mega numera de  plu persona intra u munda. = SED, si un U.N. dice a na de uti Esperanto, mi fu tenta gene sko de  id.  P= re u tali tem, mi fu promoti Glosa.

Mi ski; na habe bi tipo de persona=  intra u munda: plu-la persona ; qi  amo, e facili uti, plu komplexi fixa a=  plu verbi te dona semani; e plu  hetero persona; qi amo, e este naturali k= o, u verbi-ordina logika a  lingua.  Plu Esperanto-pe habe u bene-ra de don= a holo plu semani de u munda  per adi plu hetero fixa.  Plu sintaxi-amo-pe = vo dice uti ma brevi forma,  expekta (pl)u hetero-pe de logi u semani ex u = kontexti.

Manolo pute kogita uti plu bi mode, sed u major mero de huma= ni pote  kogita, ko flexi, uti solo mo mode.

Ci mi vo dona reflekti: q= od raisona un England-lingua gene uti ma lati  de ali hetero lingua?  U res= ponde ad u-ci qestio involve  sintaxi.  England-lingua habe pusi gramatika = flexi, e id fixa adi ad u  semani de plu verbi, ne u gramatika.

[I don’= t use Esperanto. Once in communication, I wrote in Glosa and Haitao wrote = in Esperanto: I feel he got the better side of it; I had to carefully tran= slate the Esperanto before I could understand it. If the U.N. decrees t= hat Mankind use Esperanto, I will feel it to have been a mistake, but will= then to try to learn Esperanto. Linguistically, people are divided int= o those who like exactitude and all of the grammatical inflections typical= of Esperanto; and those who pragmatically use syntax to put words togethe= r to make meaning, as in glosa (and English). In reflection, I’d say E= nglish is widespread throughout the world because it is a language with sy= ntax-based grammar. ((You won’t find this term in the Linguistic textbooks= , because I had to invent it: Glosa has a purer form of this kind of gramm= ar than English, which is a creole.))

THE BATTLE RAGES ON: WILL WE EVE= R DECIDE ON A LINGUA-MUNDA?

Saluta

Robin