Fast links: Interglossa » Glosa »
Re: Pan-glosa
Daniel MACOUIN ("Daniel MACOUIN" <lenadi_moucina@...>) on November 12, 2007
I realize that one of the most important rule of the grammar of Glosa
migh=
t be changed !
In a phrase it might be better than we consider that a word=
DO NOT
modify the followed word.
In fact it is, actually, the reality for=
many words : tense markers,
numbers, quantifiers, determinant=85
e.g. thi=
s example in Robin Gaskell seminar :
=AB ii. Sequence in Phrases
a)=
Noun Phrases
Noun - Determinant - Numerator - Quantifier - Modifie=
r(s) -
‘noun’
Marker
EG. u plura tri-loba =
mega alti, rubi
flori =BB
So, I think that, perhaps, it is better = to admit, in Pan-glosa, that in a group (phrase) a word modifies the last = word (i.e the important word (verb or noun)), except if a mark expressely = says that it modifies the word which follow it. I imagine the word ZI, whi= ch can be marked by letters (Zi) or by a special punctuation (~). If it is= a punctuation, it is not already necessery to say it if the mode of spea= king is clear.
e.g. u plura tri-loba mega ~ alti rubi flori e.g. u plura = tri-loba mega zi alti rubi flori
U, PLURA, TRI-LOBA, ALTI, RUBI, modify = FLORI, but MEGA modifies ALTI.
I am not sure if X ~ Y can have a differen= t meaning as X-Y.
Daniel
Fast links: Interglossa » Glosa »