Fast links: Interglossa » Glosa »
Re: [glosalist] Liaison
sydpidd@aol.com (sydpidd@...) on July 24, 2007
you are too unkind on yourself - glosa needs lots of criticism, don’t we all
- your comments are very valuable and you have people who agree
let’s go back to my first meeting with glosa - it seemed to me that g was
going to be a very useful tool for communication so i read further. most of the
letters seemed to me as an englishman logical til i came across q x - the rule is to have one sound for each letter yet we have x (k+s) and q(k + w) the
prounciation of the rest was vaguely english - if that is how g is constructed, i shall go no further ……….. i wonder how many sympathisers g has
lost within the first 24 letters ………. a simple change would have encouraged us to continue APL +u after q however i persiveared (i can’t spell that word after nearly 80 years of my
own language more to follow sid
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Fast links: Interglossa » Glosa »