Fast links: Interglossa » Glosa »
Wow! Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM)
Robin Fairbridge Gaskell (Robin Fairbridge Gaskell <drought-breaker@...>) on August 23, 2006
Plu Amika, I have done some research, read through the NSM Homepage, and love it!!!
Anna Wierzbicka just sat down and thunk ... and spent a number of years doing it.
She didn't get caught up in "parts of speech"; she didn't get caught up in "Classifications of Grammar": she just said there are basic categories of thought and language, and there is a small number of fundamental concepts (or semantic elements) in each category.
The sixty-three primes are distributed amongst seventeen categories, and amazingly - unlike most Linguistic theoreticising - the NSM Project does not claim to know all the answers, and acknowledges that it is a 'work in progress'.
And, if the Glosa fraternity play our cards right, an offer from us to act as a testbed for the further refinement of the NSM hypothesis could be accepted.
I don't hesitate to reprint, here, the table of semantic categories and primes:-
- - - - - - - THE CURRENT MODEL
The NSM model has changed a lot since it was first advanced in the early 1970s. In Anna Wierzbicka’s 1972 book Semantic Primitives, only 14 semantic primitives were proposed and in her 1980 book Lingua Mentalis, the inventory was not much bigger. Over the 1980s and 1990s, however, the number of proposed primes was expanded greatly, reaching a current total of 60 or so. The same period also saw the development of some important new ideas about the syntax of the semantic metalanguage. The current proposed primes can be presented, using their English exponents, in the Table below. Perhaps not surprisingly, the inventory of primes looks like a natural language in miniature. Table: Proposed semantic primes (2002); new candidates in parentheses
Substantives: I, YOU, SOMEONE, PEOPLE, SOMETHING/THING, BODY
Determiners: THIS, THE SAME, OTHER
Quantifiers: ONE, TWO, SOME, ALL, MANY/MUCH
Evaluators: GOOD, BAD
Descriptors: BIG, SMALL
Intensifier: VERY
Mental predicates: THINK, KNOW, WANT, FEEL, SEE, HEAR
Speech: SAY, WORDS, TRUE
Actions, events, movement, contact: DO, HAPPEN, MOVE, TOUCH
Existence and possession: THERE IS / EXIST, HAVE
Life and death: LIVE, DIE
Time: WHEN/TIME, NOW, BEFORE, AFTER, A LONG TIME, A SHORT TIME, FOR SOME TIME, MOMENT
Space: WHERE/PLACE, HERE, ABOVE, BELOW; FAR, NEAR; SIDE, INSIDE; TOUCHING
“Logical” concepts: NOT, MAYBE, CAN, BECAUSE, IF
Augmentor: VERY, MORE
Taxonomy, partonomy: KIND OF, PART OF
Similarity: LIKE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Now I know where they get the stuff for The President's speeches: GW Bush talks in 'primes'.
But, on a serious note, I really do think we ought to offer our services, en masse, to the people running the NSM Project. And I propose Bill Branch as our spokesman.
After all, Glosa is an up-and-running metalanguage, which is almost perfectly planned on the NSM line.
Saluta,
Robin Gaskell
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Fast links: Interglossa » Glosa »