Fast links: Interglossa » Glosa »

Re: [glosalist] heretic grammar

sydpidd@aol.com (sydpidd@...) on July 30, 2006

s sentence=”cows eat grass” ma x main part=”cows eat grass” extra part=empty

ind con inf the main part has indicate part + control  part +     info part the speaker indicates/points out/  draws attention to "cows", says that  control is in the normal order rather than  reversed "eat", adds info to the  sentence "grass" 
 
ind inf indicate part=cows info part=  "grass"
 
h mod ind indicate part/head1=the concept "cow",  indicate/modify1[of head1]number=>1 indicate/modify2[of head1]=normal  order
 
con control order part="eat" ,   control part/head2= the concept "eat" modify3[ of  head2]time=past,now,future,intermitent modify4[of head2]=normal order
 
inf info part/head3=the concept "grass" info  part/modify3[of head3]number=1
 
towards glosa indicate/head1="bovi",   indicate/modify1[head1]="plu" indicate/modify2[head1]=omit

control/head2=”vora” modify3[head2]time=”du” modify4[head2]=omit

info/head3=”gra” info/modify5[head3]=”u”

glosa order the sentence order is:- indicate +  control order + info the order in a part is :- mod number or, mod time first,  followed by the  other simple mods and ending with the head . empty or omit mods  are left out mod1 head1 mod3 head2 mod5 head3 

“plu bovi du vora u gra” (>1/plu cow/bovi du eat/vora u grass/gra)

u “Plu bovi vora” could mean “cows eat” or “foods of the cow” “Plu bovi pa vora” must mean “the cows ate”. I have several times been puzzled by a glosa phrase’s meaning in the present because writers have not
marked the beginning of the time/control/verb part. To get round the problem, I used the word “du” with the english “do eat / did eat” in mind. However, there is some confusion with duration etc. Durante/o, dura, du . “Du” seems to
mean “am eating” which usually suggests “at this moment” whereas I want “past

th main part d have indicate part + control part + info part th speaker d indicate / point out/ draw attention to “cows”, d say tht control is in th normal order rather than in reverse “eat”, d add info to th
sentence “grass” u major mero du habe indika mero +regula mero + info _mero
u dice pe du indika /punkta ex /monstra_u_via_a kura a “cows”,du dice ke
regula es in u norma ordina ma_volu de in versi “eat”,du adi info _a u frase “grass”

u glosa ordina u frase ordina es :-indika +regula ordina + info _ u ordina in u mero es :-u mod _nume or, _ mod _tem proto ge seqe ex plu hetero simpli mod _e du fini ko u kefa .plu vaku alo omite mod _du gene omite mod1 _ head1 _ mod3 _ head2 _ mod5 _ head3 _

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Fast links: Interglossa » Glosa »

Re: [glosalist] heretic grammar - Committee on language planning, FIAS. Coordination: Vergara & Hardy, PhDs.