Fast links: Interglossa » Glosa »

Re: Too much plainness

Tóth László (=?iso-8859-2?q?T=F3th=20L=E1szl=F3=20?= <leslie_toth@...>) on February 23, 2004

Saluta Robin,

If the rules of a language give the controlling of the me= aning fully in the hands of the users, without restrictions, that will lead= to rising of meaningless phrases. Only the most experienced users will = use that language correctly. But this language want to be a common language= not only for experts, but for those who will use the language only seldom.= So, it’s users wont be good novelists.

It is not admitted that a collec= tion of language-rules leave all the meaning to the context. I think, the G= losa, while it wanted to become an easy language and tended to be simple, h= ave lost a lot of the necessary features that you can find in the English, = and this way it became a more difficult to use language.

The same thing ha= ppens with Esp. In It’s case, the problem rised because of it’s exaggerated= indecency on the word order and the formative-endings. It seems that the h= istory repeat it’s own.

Saluta,

Laslo

Fast links: Interglossa » Glosa »

Re: Too much plainness - Committee on language planning, FIAS. Coordination: Vergara & Hardy, PhDs.