Re: questio de `plu'

My view is that otherwise unmarked nouns are taken to be singular in Glos= a texts

I’d personally prefer these were undefined as to plurality

Glosa = lacks a general noun marker meaning one-or-more, which might well be requi= red before undefined plurality comes to exist as a possibility in the lang= uage

— In glosalist@yahoogroups.com, “John J Foerch” <mebijohn@…> wro= te:

Ave,

Mi ofere pre-kron apologi pro ali ero in mi Glosa.

M= i habe qestio koncerne u verba `plu’.

U plus lingua mi dice es Hanyu, = alo gene nima Norma Chinese'. In Hanyu, pleisto nima-verba es gene asum= e es plurali. Si pe volu specifi solo mo nima-verba, pe volu uti verba h= omo a mo’ alo u- ci'. Si pe volu emfasi-specifi plurali nima-verba, pe= pote uti verba homo plu’ alo `oligo’. Sed usuali, si pe volu specifi = plurali, pe ne volu uti plus verba.

Ka-co, mi qestio es: Qe pe pant= o-tem uti plu' in Glosa por specifi plurali nima-verba, alo qe pe pote o= mite plu’ kron pe ne volu emfasi-specifi plurali?

Gratia, John Fo= erch