Re: Pan-glosa

— In glosalist@yahoogroups.com, “Llu=EF=BF=BDs Batlle” <viriketo@…> wro= te:

Mi la=C5=ADdas vian iniciaton. Se mi devus tion fari, mi eble pre= nus la ideon de la fundamento de esperanto.

If I hope a good Glosa, it = is because it is not esperanto. Esperanto exist, why make a new esperanto c= lone? Really, the interest of Glosa stay in its different concept of the g= rammar and than it use not endings for recognize the function of the words.=

So the problem stay : how understand what word explain the action, what w= ord is the subject, if a word is a modifier or an other thing… I think th= at Pan-glosa offers a possible maner to solve any difficulties. Thus,I do n= ot know if this new Glosa becomes easy to learn and easy to use for many pe= oples, but I am sure that if we need a other international language, it wou= ld be different of English or Esperanto or romance tongue or chinese or ara= bic or naustrian language, and so on. The rules of nobody for everybody.

D= aniel